Guadalupana wrote: I'd say: FINE i didn't want any in the first place! BUT the second point wouldn't make any sense, if i had a child and i got the death penalty for it, what would they do with all the orphans? Total barbaric behaviour.
good point Guada found a loop hole! Babies for everyone!
Well, if we add to Jaime's crazy theory, maybe they would force ppl to be sterilized. I read this book that Chale swore up and down was good and by the end of it I just wanted to kill myself, called A Fine Balance set in India and that's what they did. They had these sterilization camps where they would force ppl to go and get "fixed". And what if they only had a select few that could procreate in order to keep a balance between life and death? Hmm.. well the way things are going, cloning would solve that.
angelita wrote: Doesn't CHINA have something like this!! Certain amount of children per household or maybe it's something about only certain amount of females per household!!
jes jes.. i think you're right. i also think India has something similar
Just had to say that your Avatar is sooo cute!! Well, not as cute as mine!!!
__________________
If love is the answer, could you rephrase the question?
I suggest you start NOW – so that you can use the “holiday eating” as an excuse for the gain in weight!
NOW!! Ummm, ok but it takes two and I'm only one ...
** Ok, for some odd reason I started to get into this absurd laws kinda of thing and remember a movie with Sylvester Stallone and Sandra Bullock I think ... what was that movie????????
Anyhow, they were not allowed to have physical sex only umm how could you call it I mean they wore like these helmets that were computer connected and had sex so like cyber sex I guess ...
OMG!!!! I must be really bored ...
Gonna go for a walk
Right… walking to the ladies room to have some private time, I see… COCHINA – si haces eso te crecen pelos en las manos!
Guadalupana wrote: I'd say: FINE i didn't want any in the first place! BUT the second point wouldn't make any sense, if i had a child and i got the death penalty for it, what would they do with all the orphans? Total barbaric behaviour.
Wouldn’t that be like trading a VERY OLD car for a brand new one?
__________________
Not everything I post or say on foro are necesarily true facts. <- THAT is a fact! :blankstare:
I suggest you start NOW – so that you can use the “holiday eating” as an excuse for the gain in weight!
NOW!! Ummm, ok but it takes two and I'm only one ...
** Ok, for some odd reason I started to get into this absurd laws kinda of thing and remember a movie with Sylvester Stallone and Sandra Bullock I think ... what was that movie????????
Anyhow, they were not allowed to have physical sex only umm how could you call it I mean they wore like these helmets that were computer connected and had sex so like cyber sex I guess ...
OMG!!!! I must be really bored ...
Gonna go for a walk
Right… walking to the ladies room to have some private time, I see… COCHINA – si haces eso te crecen pelos en las manos!
__________________
Not everything I post or say on foro are necesarily true facts. <- THAT is a fact! :blankstare:
Kinda bored so I'm starting a what if thread. What would you do if the world was running low on resources and governments and law makers around the world put a ban on anyone having children as it would put the world closer to self destruction? Having children would be a law punishable by death penalty. Would you obey this absurd law or fight the power....and die?
Discuss.
I'd say: FINE i didn't want any in the first place! BUT the second point wouldn't make any sense, if i had a child and i got the death penalty for it, what would they do with all the orphans? Total barbaric behaviour.
__________________
The opinions expressed by this poster can be offensive and are mainly directed at Dogo. Delta gamma b i t c h-orama. Copyright 2008 All rights reserved.
I suggest you start NOW – so that you can use the “holiday eating” as an excuse for the gain in weight!
NOW!! Ummm, ok but it takes two and I'm only one ...
** Ok, for some odd reason I started to get into this absurd laws kinda of thing and remember a movie with Sylvester Stallone and Sandra Bullock I think ... what was that movie????????
Anyhow, they were not allowed to have physical sex only umm how could you call it I mean they wore like these helmets that were computer connected and had sex so like cyber sex I guess ...
GaLLeTiTa: Just hurry up and get pregnant before the law comes into effect! – Or does that law already exist? In which case you better hurry up even MORE before they start ENFORCING the law!
LMAO!!!!! Ok, I'll get working on it after the holidays ... or during ... ummm
I suggest you start NOW – so that you can use the “holiday eating” as an excuse for the gain in weight!
__________________
Not everything I post or say on foro are necesarily true facts. <- THAT is a fact! :blankstare:
angelita wrote: Doesn't CHINA have something like this!! Certain amount of children per household or maybe it's something about only certain amount of females per household!!
Your right Angelita! They may only have one child per family .. hence the increase on infanticide (is that how you spell it ) with female babies ...
As many want the first and only child to be a male
angelita wrote: Doesn't CHINA have something like this!! Certain amount of children per household or maybe it's something about only certain amount of females per household!!
jes jes.. i think you're right. i also think India has something similar
GaLLeTiTa: Just hurry up and get pregnant before the law comes into effect! – Or does that law already exist? In which case you better hurry up even MORE before they start ENFORCING the law!
LMAO!!!!! Ok, I'll get working on it after the holidays ... or during ... ummm
Doesn't CHINA have something like this!! Certain amount of children per household or maybe it's something about only certain amount of females per household!!
__________________
If love is the answer, could you rephrase the question?
They would find you since you may try to use a hospital to deliver the child in. Unless you give birth yourself or have a friend help you out
And for the deaths you are right. It would balance out the resources, but we'll assume Bush is the mastermind behind this universal law and he see's babies as weapons/humans of mass destruction.....ya I'm bored and delirous
-- Edited by Jaime Cruz at 13:47, 2006-12-08
Nah I wouldn't use a hospital ... I could have the baby on my own I think, it's possible ... but friends would help I'm sure they luv me
Ahhh, but with the mastermind then umm yeah your delirious!!
Dear Jaime, pls don't ever change. Thank you, Luna
ANYHOO... to answer Jaime's random question of the day, I would probably adhere to the rules but only 'cause I already have two kids and don't plan on having any more Now if I didn't have kids, hhmmm, its a toughie 'cause I love kids but if its a case of life or death. I would choose life and buy a dog.
Kinda bored so I'm starting a what if thread. What would you do if the world was running low on resources and governments and law makers around the world put a ban on anyone having children as it would put the world closer to self destruction? Having children would be a law punishable by death penalty. Would you obey this absurd law or fight the power....and die?
Discuss.
the only diff between ur post and the real world is that there is no law here yet but with time.....
Also, for every birth there is a death so the resources and thingys won't really get affected I think
GaLLeTiTa: Just hurry up and get pregnant before the law comes into effect! – Or does that law already exist? In which case you better hurry up even MORE before they start ENFORCING the law!
__________________
Not everything I post or say on foro are necesarily true facts. <- THAT is a fact! :blankstare:
Also, for every birth there is a death so the resources and thingys won't really get affected I think
They would find you since you may try to use a hospital to deliver the child in. Unless you give birth yourself or have a friend help you out
And for the deaths you are right. It would balance out the resources, but we'll assume Bush is the mastermind behind this universal law and he see's babies as weapons/humans of mass destruction.....ya I'm bored and delirous
Kinda bored so I'm starting a what if thread. What would you do if the world was running low on resources and governments and law makers around the world put a ban on anyone having children as it would put the world closer to self destruction? Having children would be a law punishable by death penalty. Would you obey this absurd law or fight the power....and die?
Guada found a loop hole! Babies for everyone! 
...
?
.....ya I'm bored and delirous 
