Mastropiero wrote:

---

After the  pain was gone, the feeling start to vanish too...I can't believe doctors do that to the poor babies, they won't know what will they miss! .....It's definitely not the same!....

---

SO it was better before?

In a scale from 0 to 10 how much sensation you think one can lose?

I don't agree with it...I think like the rest, it all has to do with hygene. When they are new born as a parent you have to make sure it's clean and teach than as they grow up.

I reviewed some information on the web and noted the following

- there is evidence to support that newborn male babies under one year of age have a higher occurrence of UTI if they are not circumcised.  After this age, the rates of UTI infection is pretty much the same for circ. vs noncirc. .

- breastfeeding helps protect against UTI

- Overall, women are more likely to have UTI infections over men

- another reason boys were circumcised is to discourage boys from playing the skin flute since there is loss of sensitivity from circumcision.

Which leads me to following revelation.

- On the topic of hygiene, I always understood that it meant that the boy has to maintain good hygiene throughout his life but I've learned that the newborns are most at risk.  So it is the parents who have to be careful with the hygiene!  This makes sense since there is a heavy reliance on diapers and diaper products, not to mention the fact that some diaper changes are usually done in haste and not very thoroughly.

With proper parental care, there is no need for circumcision.

http://www.infocirc.org/uti2.htm

McOSIRIS wrote:

---

Colombiana4Life wrote:

---

If I had a son I definately would.  It avoids urinary tract infections later in life.  Not to say that all men that are not circumcised will go through this.  I have known of many little boys and even men, that they end up getting circumcised when they`re older because of infection, etc.

---

there are no scientific studies that proof this theory... everyday normal hygene would do the trick...

---

After the  pain was gone, the feeling start to vanish too...I can't believe doctors do that to the poor babies, they won't know what will they miss! .....It's definitely not the same!....

DON CHELO wrote:

---

I HAV A GOOD FRIEND DAT JUST HAD A NEW BABY BOY AND THEY ARE THINKING IN GETTING THE BABY CIRCUMSIZED. THEY ARE JEWISH SO IS A COMMON PRACTICE. DO YOU GUYS AGREE WITH THIS OR DISAGREE. WOULD U HAV UR BABY BOY GO THRU THIS PROCEDURE??? 

---

           nope i wouldnt do it! Its there penis let them do what they please with it!!! not my choice and yes it has a lot to do with hygene if there getting UTI same with women!

oh and also this is caused if u dont pee after sex or before sex!!!

McOSIRIS wrote:

---

Colombiana4Life wrote:

---

If I had a son I definately would.  It avoids urinary tract infections later in life.  Not to say that all men that are not circumcised will go through this.  I have known of many little boys and even men, that they end up getting circumcised when they`re older because of infection, etc.

---

there are no scientific studies that proof this theory... everyday normal hygiene would do the trick...

---

I AGREE WITH YOU. I THINK IT HAS TO DO WITH PERSONAL HYGENE!!!

Colombiana4Life wrote:

---

If I had a son I definately would.  It avoids urinary tract infections later in life.  Not to say that all men that are not circumcised will go through this.  I have known of many little boys and even men, that they end up getting circumcised when they`re older because of infection, etc.

---

I'm against circumcision in males and females, unless is medically reccomended...