Lahtina wrote: God wrote: Lahtina wrote: Estás para comercial de colgate! Pero hazle el favor a la de la derecha. Ok, ya me charapeo. Jajajaja me deje como Marco Antonio Regil..LMAO perame deja le compongo a la guerita desabrida Ah que no era él el de la foto? LOL Mire nomas le quite el pellejo del frijol...una asoliadita de Lagartija , 2 chelas y pronostico reservao..... Edited by God at 22:51, 2006-02-19
Mmmmm... sigue estando muy desabrida. Usté con su bronceado perfecto... no pues, la pasó a chiflar a la pobre. Next time no se pare junto a ella.
Lahtina wrote: God wrote: Lahtina wrote: Estás para comercial de colgate! Pero hazle el favor a la de la derecha. Ok, ya me charapeo. Jajajaja me deje como Marco Antonio Regil..LMAO perame deja le compongo a la guerita desabrida Ah que no era él el de la foto? LOL
Mire nomas le quite el pellejo del frijol...una asoliadita de Lagartija , 2 chelas y pronostico reservao.....
Lahtina wrote: Estás para comercial de colgate! Pero hazle el favor a la de la derecha. Ok, ya me charapeo. Jajajaja me deje como Marco Antonio Regil..LMAO perame deja le compongo a la guerita desabrida
Interesting.. in that case you might want to consider another option.
If you have a flatbed scanner, you can probably get away with scanning good portions of the shirt and you can set the resolution to high for extra detail.
Torontotrucho, Actually, 800 is more effective when used in low light situations with slow shutter speed. If you are photographing mementos I don't recommend 800 film. The resulting photo will also appear 'grainy'. 100 or 200 will do. Use as much light as possible or with flash if necessary. What exactly are you photographing by the way?
Thanks QUixote, I trying to get some pictures of signatures written on my old high school shirt , and that's why I need to get really close to the writings. It's a bit of archeology work now ,hahaha!.
Actually, 800 is more effective when used in low light situations with slow shutter speed. If you are photographing mementos I don't recommend 800 film. The resulting photo will also appear 'grainy'.
100 or 200 will do. Use as much light as possible or with flash if necessary.
torontotrucho wrote: Question for God... Dear God, I have an old fashion 35 mm camera, I tried to get some pictures of my high School mementos but they were too dark and the guy at the photo lab wasn't able to develope them; I used a 800 film. Can you tell me what went grown, should I use a 200 film? Thanks amigo. did u use a flash? because the 800 film is made for that indoor "with flash" type of shoots. X@vier
YEs, I used a flash, well I'm thinking about getting a digital camera as Ricky suggested, we'll see.
torontotrucho wrote: Question for God... Dear God, I have an old fashion 35 mm camera, I tried to get some pictures of my high School mementos but they were too dark and the guy at the photo lab wasn't able to develope them; I used a 800 film. Can you tell me what went grown, should I use a 200 film? Thanks amigo.
did u use a flash? because the 800 film is made for that indoor "with flash" type of shoots.