Afrodita wrote: miguel wrote: i think content editor is the way to go. but i don't edit it.....i just refuse it or accept it..... okay, then content moderator is the way to go! or content manager, if you want to sound more important I wouldn't say QA is the right position here.
I need some help finding a term to describe a responsibility here at work. How would you call a person that is in charge of refusing stuff clients want to put on a site. If things don't meet the requirements to be posted. That person can send it back and say it's not good enough. How would you call that?
I need some help finding a term to describe a responsibility here at work.
How would you call a person that is in charge of refusing stuff clients want to put on a site. If things don't meet the requirements to be posted. That person can send it back and say it's not good enough.
I think QUALITY ASSURANCE is the WAY to go!!!
I wouldn't say QA is the right position here. 
Roses are red violets are korny, when I think of you Ohh baby I get horny...
