angelita dulce wrote: I know what u mean. I just read it on www.pulse24.com I think it's crazy that they let this one go. It's unbelievable!! After he kills his son, they portray him as a loving and caring father. Caring my a$$. Would he have been in El Slavador, someone in the mother's family would have shot him by now!!!
Yup you're right.....BUT we have to give credit to his LAWYER to convince the Judge of that Bull crap......
I know what u mean. I just read it on www.pulse24.com I think it's crazy that they let this one go. It's unbelievable!! After he kills his son, they portray him as a loving and caring father. Caring my a$$. Would he have been in El Slavador, someone in the mother's family would have shot him by now!!!
Sometimes I find Canadian Law System very very STUPID ! check this OUT ==>
LONDON, Ont. (CP) - A father who believed he was saving his 11-year-old epileptic son from a life of hell was found not criminally responsible Friday of drugging and suffocating the child after a night of video games and television.
In her ruling, the judge decided David Carmichael was a loving and caring parent, but both badly deluded and desperate when he killed his boy. "We will probably never fully understand the desperation that led David Carmichael to take (the life of) his little boy," said Ontario Superior Court Justice Helen Rady.
"He was clearly a devoted and caring parent who looked for opportunities for his son to excel."
Rady ruled that Carmichael should be sent to a medium-security psychiatric facility in Brockville, Ont., for treatment as soon as practical as both Crown and defence recommended.
Within 90 days, the Ontario Review Board will decide on any further treatment and how long he should remain there.
"I am satisfied that Mr. Carmichael poses no real threat to the public," said Rady.
"Indeed, Mr. Carmichael likely poses more of a threat to himself than to the public."