go_fish wrote:Thanks for the compliment, I´m trying to keep it natural so the people at the parish won´t get scared or anything on account of too racy material.
now, as for the administrador... I´m sorry but I don´t get it. I almost got it and then I got high.
Er... I "am" the administrator (this reminds me of Chapelle´s skit on the copy service joint! lol!... gotta watch it).
So was I when I read it....I'm gonna have to read it again....
__________________
Roses are red violets are korny, when I think of you Ohh baby I get horny...
Gringa Lahtina wrote: Oh my God! Who the hell is writing these things? This is the second ambiguous headline I've seen in less than two weeks! And then people say writing skills aren't important.
Oh my God! Who the hell is writing these things? This is the second ambiguous headline I've seen in less than two weeks! And then people say writing skills aren't important.
__________________
Audio, video, disco.
So... it's been... what, like a year that I've had this signature? Did anyone get that it says: I hear, I see, I learn? :(
Gringa Lahtina wrote: "La cueva, de 2 mil años de antiguedad, había sido descubierta en 1980 por el arquéologo Amos Kloner en el barrio Talpiyot de Jerusalén. En la cueva había 10 sarcófagos, seis de los cuales tenían inscripciones que incluían los nombres "Jesus hijo de José", "Maria" en 2 sarcófagos y "Juda hijo de Jesús".
I found this quite funny. I wonder if back then, just like today, these were just your run of the mill names?
"Yo todavía estoy esperando a que alguien explique con qué muestra van a realizar los exámenes de ADN para identificar los restos de Jesús o de persona alguna que haya vivido hace 2,000 años... pero esa es sólo una de varias interrogantes alrededor de este "hallazgo"."
Exactly what MM and I (and I'm sure anyone else with half a brain) have been talking about.
"Sólo para mencionar otra, los descubridores / realizadores parecen haber ignorado que José, Jesús, Judá y María estaban entre los nombres más comunes de los judíos de los primeros años de nuestra era. Yo no recuerdo exactamente dónde leí eso, pero no más echen un vistazo al Nuevo Testamento, que hasta yo me confundo con cuál María se está hablando en cada caso."
Aaaah, I love it when I don't have to wait too long to get an answer. Still, I'd like some proof of this.
Hmmm, well... thanks, Go Fish. I quite enjoyed reading your blog. When I first heard about this story and then heard what the Vatican spokesperson had to say I was like . Apparently (no me consta) he said something like: "Body, DNA? That's absurd! Everyone knows that Jesus resurrected on the third day and went to heaven."
Religion is "just" a language (whether verbal, symbolic, emotional, story-like, mythical, you name it). A very powerful, encompassing, comprehensive -as well as defective and prone to abuse as well... it´s just language, a beautiful language, maybe, yes, but it´s just that.
So is arts, so is science. And on, and on. At points, one of them happens to combine a few of the others, but it´s never a one sided accomplishment.
The guy at the Vatican... I´m sorry, but if any group, whether church or not church oriented, in the western side of the world, at least, still dares to sustain a policy that is intrinsecally discriminative of women... I´d rather not even bother with it. I wouldn´t worry, cuz that´s likely the least controversial response he´s had to give in the last month.
And I read somewhere that the archeologist who´s now saying it´s all a load of bull was the one saying that those names were sooo common and all. He also wondered WHY, HOW would a Bethelem family have found its resting place in uptown Jerusalem?
I am not assuming this as any kind of vindication for religion, or christian religion, for that matter. But I do hope it is being embarrasing as heck for Cameron and Co.
soooo... I DO have half a brain! Wheeeee!
Then again, he was trying to pull that off in the ol´USA, and if W Bush did it, why not Cameron? He won three oscars, after all.
Gringa Lahtina wrote: "La cueva, de 2 mil años de antiguedad, había sido descubierta en 1980 por el arquéologo Amos Kloner en el barrio Talpiyot de Jerusalén. En la cueva había 10 sarcófagos, seis de los cuales tenían inscripciones que incluían los nombres "Jesus hijo de José", "Maria" en 2 sarcófagos y "Juda hijo de Jesús".
I found this quite funny. I wonder if back then, just like today, these were just your run of the mill names?
"Yo todavía estoy esperando a que alguien explique con qué muestra van a realizar los exámenes de ADN para identificar los restos de Jesús o de persona alguna que haya vivido hace 2,000 años... pero esa es sólo una de varias interrogantes alrededor de este "hallazgo"."
Exactly what MM and I (and I'm sure anyone else with half a brain) have been talking about.
"Sólo para mencionar otra, los descubridores / realizadores parecen haber ignorado que José, Jesús, Judá y María estaban entre los nombres más comunes de los judíos de los primeros años de nuestra era. Yo no recuerdo exactamente dónde leí eso, pero no más echen un vistazo al Nuevo Testamento, que hasta yo me confundo con cuál María se está hablando en cada caso."
Aaaah, I love it when I don't have to wait too long to get an answer. Still, I'd like some proof of this.
Hmmm, well... thanks, Go Fish. I quite enjoyed reading your blog. When I first heard about this story and then heard what the Vatican spokesperson had to say I was like . Apparently (no me consta) he said something like: "Body, DNA? That's absurd! Everyone knows that Jesus resurrected on the third day and went to heaven."
I always find it funny that we are to believe without any doubt that Jesus walked on water, and dies, resurrected and went to a place called heaven. Yet when we think that he may have been a mortal man, who at some point dies and was buried we are too think the idea is absurd/unrealistic
"La cueva, de 2 mil años de antiguedad, había sido descubierta en 1980 por el arquéologo Amos Kloner en el barrio Talpiyot de Jerusalén. En la cueva había 10 sarcófagos, seis de los cuales tenían inscripciones que incluían los nombres "Jesus hijo de José", "Maria" en 2 sarcófagos y "Juda hijo de Jesús".
I found this quite funny. I wonder if back then, just like today, these were just your run of the mill names?
"Yo todavía estoy esperando a que alguien explique con qué muestra van a realizar los exámenes de ADN para identificar los restos de Jesús o de persona alguna que haya vivido hace 2,000 años... pero esa es sólo una de varias interrogantes alrededor de este "hallazgo"."
Exactly what MM and I (and I'm sure anyone else with half a brain) have been talking about.
"Sólo para mencionar otra, los descubridores / realizadores parecen haber ignorado que José, Jesús, Judá y María estaban entre los nombres más comunes de los judíos de los primeros años de nuestra era. Yo no recuerdo exactamente dónde leí eso, pero no más echen un vistazo al Nuevo Testamento, que hasta yo me confundo con cuál María se está hablando en cada caso."
Aaaah, I love it when I don't have to wait too long to get an answer. Still, I'd like some proof of this.
Hmmm, well... thanks, Go Fish. I quite enjoyed reading your blog. When I first heard about this story and then heard what the Vatican spokesperson had to say I was like . Apparently (no me consta) he said something like: "Body, DNA? That's absurd! Everyone knows that Jesus resurrected on the third day and went to heaven."
__________________
Audio, video, disco.
So... it's been... what, like a year that I've had this signature? Did anyone get that it says: I hear, I see, I learn? :(
McOSIRIS wrote: WASHINGTON - Leading archaeologists in Israel and the United States have denounced the purported discovery of the tomb of Jesus as a publicity stunt.
Scorn for the Discovery Channel's claim to have found the burial place of Jesus, Mary Magdalene and - most explosively - their possible son came not just from Christian scholars but also from Jewish and secular experts who said their judgments were not affected by any desire to uphold Christian orthodoxy.
Since I heard James Cameron was gonna be the director of the documentary the whole thing smelled fishy to me....
I find it odd that they can claim this to be a publicity without any DNA evidence to compare it to. It seems that their only defence is that the name's are common for that time That could be true, but it's also odd that the common names have a link in the fact that the people buried are Jesus, Mary and from another report I read 2 men who's names appear to be that of his disciples.
McOSIRIS wrote: WASHINGTON - Leading archaeologists in Israel and the United States have denounced the purported discovery of the tomb of Jesus as a publicity stunt.
Scorn for the Discovery Channel's claim to have found the burial place of Jesus, Mary Magdalene and - most explosively - their possible son came not just from Christian scholars but also from Jewish and secular experts who said their judgments were not affected by any desire to uphold Christian orthodoxy.
WASHINGTON - Leading archaeologists in Israel and the United States have denounced the purported discovery of the tomb of Jesus as a publicity stunt.
Scorn for the Discovery Channel's claim to have found the burial place of Jesus, Mary Magdalene and - most explosively - their possible son came not just from Christian scholars but also from Jewish and secular experts who said their judgments were not affected by any desire to uphold Christian orthodoxy.