JOKER_ESCO wrote:

---

Salsera de Corazon wrote: JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: LGigolo wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote:    I need to hear it, never heard it before when you do, burn me a copy Yeah, yeah, I burn you a copy HEY I WANT A COPY 2 I thought you wanted it to be the friend with benefits LOL Yeah I do but ni caso me hisiste so entosnes me quedo con el CD LoL but if u do want 2 be my friend con benefits LOL, well discuss that , next time we have our tequilas Ok It sound really good so when are we having tequilas

---

well I don't think I am going to make it to the Vida this Friday, but I will be going to the alex cd release so maybe there, are you going?

JOKER_ESCO wrote:

---

Salsera de Corazon wrote: JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: LGigolo wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote:    I need to hear it, never heard it before when you do, burn me a copy Yeah, yeah, I burn you a copy HEY I WANT A COPY 2 I thought you wanted it to be the friend with benefits LOL Yeah I do but ni caso me hisiste so entosnes me quedo con el CD LoL but if u do want 2 be my friend con benefits

---

LOL, well discuss that , next time we have our tequilas

JOKER_ESCO wrote:

---

Salsera de Corazon wrote: LGigolo wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote:    I need to hear it, never heard it before when you do, burn me a copy Yeah, yeah, I burn you a copy HEY I WANT A COPY 2

---

I thought you wanted it to be the friend with benefits LOL

thx for the welcome.

:) :)

Confu gave me the briefieng after i posted my first message so it's all goooood.

LMFAO.......... 

 

maybe a little bit of both .......

Julie wrote:

---

Well, you came to the right place mendoza, that's what the Foro is for !

---

to find friends with benefits???

That article was great, in my opinion.  I"m all for the "freinds with benefits" thing.  I'll tell you straight up.

"Plenty of singles out there might like to establish a sex-only relationship — but how do you go about it?  At times, being single is all any of us want. We’re happy to have time for our friends, we like being able to do whatever we want, and we enjoy having our beds to ourselves. Yet part of us remains unsatisfied: our hormones.

They’re the ones we should hold accountable (especially during periods of sexual drought) for finding everyone from the papergirl to the "female" bus driver sexually attractive."

 

My sex drive is intense, I see a beautiful girl and I feel like telling her.  It's not always about having sex, sometimes it's just a straight physical attraction.  I think girls should be more open-minded for things like this. Yes it's true there are STD's/AIDS and what not, but there are many ways to prevent that.  It's also true that you never know, you might get something, even if u do protect yourself, but really, how many of us think about that when your sex drive get's put into gear.

 

I say a friend that you know that you find attractive, would be the best for this.  It's very rare and very difficult to find someone who's open-minded and down for something spontaneous ike this.

My main reason for liking "friends with benefits" is because it makes up for the " partner I haven't found yet".  I love having relationships and sharing the world around me with my girl, but when i'm not with a girl, my sex drive runs wild, and I need to take care of it...

Coincidentally, I've been thinking about this topic for some time now, I just felt like i had to share my opinion.

 

DulceGalletita wrote:

---

McOSIRIS wrote:  PALTAS is the "correct" word for Aguacate... it's used in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile Ummmm, I prefer AGUACATE!!!!!!!!!! Paltas como que no se sounds weird ... But rephrasing my earlier post then ... So if I'm ok with this topic ... does it make me a palta (like mczuperduper says) ... * Now I'm out

---

how about aguacate????

sounds like aguacaca or something....

Julie wrote:

---

McOSIRIS wrote:  I think she meant "PALTAS"... Y eso que es PALTAS is the "correct" word for Aguacate... it's used in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile Pfffffffff, whatever !!!!!!!!!       ask Dogo if u don't believe me... Since when does Dogo speak proper Spanish     ....... lol

---

AY DIO MIO!!!!!!!!!!! : rofl:

El vicioooooooooo now I'm out

McOSIRIS wrote:

---

 PALTAS is the "correct" word for Aguacate... it's used in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile

---

Ummmm, I prefer AGUACATE!!!!!!!!!! Paltas como que no se sounds weird ...

But rephrasing my earlier post then ...

So if I'm ok with this topic ... does it make me a palta (like mczuperduper says) ...

* Now I'm out

McOSIRIS wrote:

---

DulceGalletita wrote: McOSIRIS wrote: Dogo wrote: Dulce wrote: who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas Poetas Anyway, I agree with youI also think they should be banished, burned with cigarettes and killed by stoning, AT LEAST!! I think she meant "PALTAS"... Y eso que es PALTAS is the "correct" word for Aguacate... it's used in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile

---

Pfffffffff, whatever !!!!!!!!!

 

 

 

DulceGalletita wrote:

---

McOSIRIS wrote: Dogo wrote: Dulce wrote: who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas Poetas Anyway, I agree with youI also think they should be banished, burned with cigarettes and killed by stoning, AT LEAST!! I think she meant "PALTAS"... Y eso que es

---

PALTAS is the "correct" word for Aguacate...

it's used in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile

Dogo wrote:

---

Dulce wrote: who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas Poetas Anyway, I agree with youI also think they should be banished, burned with cigarettes and killed by stoning, AT LEAST!!

---

I think she meant "PALTAS"...

Dulce wrote:

---

who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas

---

vayase a lavar la boca con jabon niña !

 

JOKER_ESCO wrote:

---

Colombiana4Life wrote: JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: Dulce wrote: who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas Not necessarly, I read the article and there is a lot that I agree with and I don't think that makes me a p*ta, so don't insult the girls here becuase everyone is free to think or do whatever we want Both avenues require a certain amount of sexual maturity, but McKee thinks that for the sake of the friendship, it’s best to avoid the friend situation unless there’s a specific friend in mind we’re already interested in. If there is, McKee suggests just being honest. “Tell them ‘I’m sexually attracted to you,’ ” she says. Or if you want to be more coy: “I read an article about friends with benefits, what do you think about that?” The important thing is to open that line of communication.   The less messy route, then, is to establish a sexual relationship with someone we’re not so emotionally connected with. But how? After all, walking up to a stranger and asking if they’d like to have sex might be a tad too forward. McKee recommends dating websites like Lavalife with sections devoted to casual encounters. This way both parties know they’re there just for sex and not a relationship     Don't worry about it salsera PPL just judge without reading what is all about it. I guess you are right Joker   Now that u agree with me let's talk about friend with benefits LoL LoL You need to listen to that song "Friends with Benefits", u`ll get a kick out of it. Nunca la e escuchado who sings it???

---

It`s a new Soca jam by an artist called "Problem Child" from St. Vincent.  I`ve tried to download it but I can`t find it.  The only place I can listen to it is on Flow 93.5 on Sundays during their Soca Therapy or thru www.toronto-lime.com/music/new_music.htm. 

LGigolo wrote:

---

Salsera de Corazon wrote:    I need to hear it, never heard it before when you do, burn me a copy

---

Yeah, yeah, I burn you a copy

Colombiana4Life wrote:

---

JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: Dulce wrote: who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas Not necessarly, I read the article and there is a lot that I agree with and I don't think that makes me a p*ta, so don't insult the girls here becuase everyone is free to think or do whatever we want Both avenues require a certain amount of sexual maturity, but McKee thinks that for the sake of the friendship, it’s best to avoid the friend situation unless there’s a specific friend in mind we’re already interested in. If there is, McKee suggests just being honest. “Tell them ‘I’m sexually attracted to you,’ ” she says. Or if you want to be more coy: “I read an article about friends with benefits, what do you think about that?” The important thing is to open that line of communication.   The less messy route, then, is to establish a sexual relationship with someone we’re not so emotionally connected with. But how? After all, walking up to a stranger and asking if they’d like to have sex might be a tad too forward. McKee recommends dating websites like Lavalife with sections devoted to casual encounters. This way both parties know they’re there just for sex and not a relationship     Don't worry about it salsera PPL just judge without reading what is all about it. I guess you are right Joker   Now that u agree with me let's talk about friend with benefits LoL LoL You need to listen to that song "Friends with Benefits", u`ll get a kick out of it.

---

Nunca la e escuchado who sings it???

JOKER_ESCO wrote:

---

Salsera de Corazon wrote: JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: Dulce wrote: who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas Not necessarly, I read the article and there is a lot that I agree with and I don't think that makes me a p*ta, so don't insult the girls here becuase everyone is free to think or do whatever we want Both avenues require a certain amount of sexual maturity, but McKee thinks that for the sake of the friendship, it’s best to avoid the friend situation unless there’s a specific friend in mind we’re already interested in. If there is, McKee suggests just being honest. “Tell them ‘I’m sexually attracted to you,’ ” she says. Or if you want to be more coy: “I read an article about friends with benefits, what do you think about that?” The important thing is to open that line of communication.   The less messy route, then, is to establish a sexual relationship with someone we’re not so emotionally connected with. But how? After all, walking up to a stranger and asking if they’d like to have sex might be a tad too forward. McKee recommends dating websites like Lavalife with sections devoted to casual encounters. This way both parties know they’re there just for sex and not a relationship     Don't worry about it salsera PPL just judge without reading what is all about it. I guess you are right Joker   Now that u agree with me let's talk about friend with benefits LoL LoL

---

You need to listen to that song "Friends with Benefits", u`ll get a kick out of it.

JOKER_ESCO wrote:

---

Salsera de Corazon wrote: JOKER_ESCO wrote: Salsera de Corazon wrote: Dulce wrote: who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas Not necessarly, I read the article and there is a lot that I agree with and I don't think that makes me a p*ta, so don't insult the girls here becuase everyone is free to think or do whatever we want Both avenues require a certain amount of sexual maturity, but McKee thinks that for the sake of the friendship, it’s best to avoid the friend situation unless there’s a specific friend in mind we’re already interested in. If there is, McKee suggests just being honest. “Tell them ‘I’m sexually attracted to you,’ ” she says. Or if you want to be more coy: “I read an article about friends with benefits, what do you think about that?” The important thing is to open that line of communication.   The less messy route, then, is to establish a sexual relationship with someone we’re not so emotionally connected with. But how? After all, walking up to a stranger and asking if they’d like to have sex might be a tad too forward. McKee recommends dating websites like Lavalife with sections devoted to casual encounters. This way both parties know they’re there just for sex and not a relationship     Don't worry about it salsera PPL just judge without reading what is all about it. I guess you are right Joker   Now that u agree with me let's talk about friend with benefits LoL LoL

---

 

 

LOL

Dulce wrote:

---

who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas

---

          Whoa!! this is a tad judmental dont you think?!?a "little" on the harsh side if you ask me...:!? !

Salsera de Corazon wrote:

---

Dulce wrote: who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas Not necessarly, I read the article and there is a lot that I agree with and I don't think that makes me a p*ta, so don't insult the girls here becuase everyone is free to think or do whatever we want Both avenues require a certain amount of sexual maturity, but McKee thinks that for the sake of the friendship, it’s best to avoid the friend situation unless there’s a specific friend in mind we’re already interested in. If there is, McKee suggests just being honest. “Tell them ‘I’m sexually attracted to you,’ ” she says. Or if you want to be more coy: “I read an article about friends with benefits, what do you think about that?” The important thing is to open that line of communication.   The less messy route, then, is to establish a sexual relationship with someone we’re not so emotionally connected with. But how? After all, walking up to a stranger and asking if they’d like to have sex might be a tad too forward. McKee recommends dating websites like Lavalife with sections devoted to casual encounters. This way both parties know they’re there just for sex and not a relationship  

---

 

Don't worry about it salsera PPL just judge without reading what is all about it.

Dulce wrote:

---

who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas

---

Not necessarly, I read the article and there is a lot that I agree with and I don't think that makes me a p*ta, so don't insult the girls here becuase everyone is free to think or do whatever we want

Both avenues require a certain amount of sexual maturity, but McKee thinks that for the sake of the friendship, it’s best to avoid the friend situation unless there’s a specific friend in mind we’re already interested in. If there is, McKee suggests just being honest. “Tell them ‘I’m sexually attracted to you,’ ” she says. Or if you want to be more coy: “I read an article about friends with benefits, what do you think about that?” The important thing is to open that line of communication.

 

The less messy route, then, is to establish a sexual relationship with someone we’re not so emotionally connected with. But how? After all, walking up to a stranger and asking if they’d like to have sex might be a tad too forward. McKee recommends dating websites like Lavalife with sections devoted to casual encounters. This way both parties know they’re there just for sex and not a relationship

 

who have friends "with benefits"? all I know is that whoever is ok with this (especially women), are plain p**tas

Pelon` wrote:

---

More like friends with aids/std's

---

Read the whole thing before u answer, cause I don't think u got the point of this...