friends with rights..!!??

DulceGalletita · Foro Master

RE: friends with rights..!!??

Dogo · Comandante

LaDyBuG wrote:

@ Dogo & Julie Did you both think like this before marriage? (I'm just curious)

Well, fisrt of all, Julie and I were never married! we barely know each other!!!!

OHHHH!!......you mean!!!............................ hmmmmmm (trying to remember) I think so... maybe not so much, or I lacked the skills, or maybe not so much skills, but the maturity to see sex (not lovemaking) for what it is, cold-heartedly, pleasure

Then again, that's almost my perpetual mode, lately (lol) or maybe you get pickier as you get older and become a perfectionist because you've failed before and try to overcompensate waaaaay too much, i dunno

Aaaaand the short answer would be, lol!... yes, but no as much

DulceGalletita · Foro Master

LaDyBuG wrote:

@ Dogo & Julie Did you both think like this before marriage? (I'm just curious)

Umm, stealing the question LoL!!!! I haven't gotten married BUT people change do to situations and circumstances ... I just started to think when this topic did become and ok with me and all I can say is that if I was asked about Friends with Rights about 10 years ago or less I would have said:

AY DIO MIO!! Que pecado

Now, gotta go and think of why my mindset changed thanks LB ...

LoL

Julie · Comandante

LaDyBuG wrote:

@ Dogo & Julie Did you both think like this before marriage? (I'm just curious)

I was to naive and young at that time to realise what a friend with right meant.

E.T.A (cc Lahtina) I amlost lived right away with him. Plus I learned many things in Mx that would have probably never croosed my mind otherwise.

-- Edited by Julie at 08:36, 2006-04-28

LaDyBuG · Comandante

@ Dogo & Julie

Did you both think like this before marriage? (I'm just curious)

bistor · Guru

I'm very friendly.

torontotrucho · Guru

Remember this: EL Escandalo es el malo.

I agree if and only if both parties have known each other at least for a few months, and are intimate and mature enough to TRUST the other for clean sex and discretion. I assume both parties are not married or having a serious relationship with someone else.

DulceGalletita · Foro Master

Salsagal wrote:

I thank God that i don't have to worry about that sort of thing anymore. I think that if 2 friends have an attraction and they are both single, it's ok to fool around. Just as long as the communication is always there. Like if one becomes interested in starting up with someone else keep the other informed.

Exactly, and if feelings get involved more then attraction you gotta let the other know ...

Salsagal · Guru

I thank God that i don't have to worry about that sort of thing anymore. I think that if 2 friends have an attraction and they are both single, it's ok to fool around. Just as long as the communication is always there. Like if one becomes interested in starting up with someone else keep the other informed.

DulceGalletita · Foro Master

Julie wrote:

@ Miguel Try again and see if we believe you ! @ Girl, why not ? we're adults no ? So if you're attracted to someone and this person happens to be or becoming a friend, go for it ! If it developped into something else, nice for both of you and if not, well, at least you have a good friend with who you can share some good moments, besides talks I mean But don't play around, that wouldn't be fair. Meaning No se vayan de flor en flor. Friends with benefits yes but don't loose the respect either ! So be honest and respectful and it will work out just fine

OMG!!! I sooooooooo AGREE with this

I mean if their is a friendship and it's a right moment and you both know that it could or could not develop anything else it is a risk .... I call it FWB ...

But like MJ said only with one friend, not many at a given time ... and you should not be in a relationship nor the FWB ...

Colombiana4Life · Foro Master

McOSIRIS wrote:

Colombiana4Life wrote: McOSIRIS wrote: Dogo wrote: I don’t think that sex, in a case such as this, is used as a method of expressing your feelings for your friend (you do that out of bed)…. But merely a good time Have you ALWAYS had sex with some sort of emotional/romantic attachment? unfortunately yes..... Perhaps I should learn how to think with my lower head a bit more... I think it`s a Scorpio trait but I'm Sagitarious for fak sakes!!!!!! what am I doing wrong????

I know, November.... but still, dont mind me.

McOSIRIS · Comandante

Colombiana4Life wrote:

McOSIRIS wrote: Dogo wrote: I don’t think that sex, in a case such as this, is used as a method of expressing your feelings for your friend (you do that out of bed)…. But merely a good time Have you ALWAYS had sex with some sort of emotional/romantic attachment? unfortunately yes..... Perhaps I should learn how to think with my lower head a bit more... I think it`s a Scorpio trait

but I'm Sagitarious for fak sakes!!!!!!

what am I doing wrong????

Chale Tanga · TOP Guru

miguel wrote:

hopefully, one day, i will meet someone that i love enough to make love with for the first time. virgin still, -miguel

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

Colombiana4Life · Foro Master

McOSIRIS wrote:

Dogo wrote: I don’t think that sex, in a case such as this, is used as a method of expressing your feelings for your friend (you do that out of bed)…. But merely a good time Have you ALWAYS had sex with some sort of emotional/romantic attachment? unfortunately yes..... Perhaps I should learn how to think with my lower head a bit more...

I think it`s a Scorpio trait

miguel · TOP Guru

hopefully, one day, i will meet someone that i love enough to make love with for the first time.

virgin still,

-miguel

McOSIRIS · Comandante

Dogo wrote:

Yikes! ya, perhaps you should... otherwise you're just setting yourslef up for heartbreak every time! (and you'll "get" more, lol)

I think I'm used to it by now...

Dogo · Comandante

McOSIRIS wrote:

Dogo wrote: I don’t think that sex, in a case such as this, is used as a method of expressing your feelings for your friend (you do that out of bed)…. But merely a good time Have you ALWAYS had sex with some sort of emotional/romantic attachment? unfortunately yes..... Perhaps I should learn how to think with my lower head a bit more...

Yikes! ya, perhaps you should... otherwise you're just setting yourslef up for heartbreak every time!

(and you'll "get" more, lol)

Salsera de Corazon · TOP Guru

Gastone wrote:

I approve "friends with rights" but I think que hay que dejar las cosas claras! conversar para que despues no hayan mal entendidos ni nadie salga herido.

Well say

Gastone · Guru

I approve "friends with rights" but I think que hay que dejar las cosas claras! conversar para que despues no hayan mal entendidos ni nadie salga herido.

LGigolo · Comandante

you're welcome

Salsera de Corazon · TOP Guru

Well I think that there is nothing wrong to have a frined with benefits, I think that sometimes two people can be attracted just on the sex part, and nothing else, but also everything is with respect as long as the two people are single is o.k.

Jade · Guru

LGigolo wrote:

Jade wrote: @ L giga man...lol.. .okay I am trying to remember what this "BYOC" thing stands for but i dont really wanna wokr my brain..care to define? It's a CHEF's term meaning: Bring Your Own CONDiMentS! (just in case HE (the sous-cheff) doesn't have any and you just get in the mood to get cooking something HOT and STEAMY -- Edited by LGigolo at 11:47, 2006-04-27

Okay thank you...

LGigolo · Comandante

Jade wrote:

@ L giga man...lol.. .okay I am trying to remember what this "BYOC" thing stands for but i dont really wanna wokr my brain..care to define?

It's a CHEF's term meaning: Bring Your Own CONDiMentS!

(just in case HE (the sous-cheff) doesn't have any and you just get in the mood to get cooking something HOT and STEAMY

-- Edited by LGigolo at 11:47, 2006-04-27

Jade · Guru

@ L giga man...lol.. .okay I am trying to remember what this "BYOC" thing stands for but i dont really wanna wokr my brain..care to define?

McOSIRIS · Comandante

Dogo wrote:

I don’t think that sex, in a case such as this, is used as a method of expressing your feelings for your friend (you do that out of bed)…. But merely a good time Have you ALWAYS had sex with some sort of emotional/romantic attachment?

unfortunately yes.....

Perhaps I should learn how to think with my lower head a bit more...

LGigolo · Comandante

Motown Junkie wrote:

I'm not that great at math - I'm not THAT old... only 48 Ok! Much better!!! UH HA - so you don't want an ABUELO... just a "PAPI"! CLARO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

alright talk to you again in the year 2057 or whatever the year was... give me a call a few years earlier see if we still alive

LGigolo · Comandante

Jade wrote:

First: is there an actualy difference between a BOOTYCALL and Friends w/ Benefits..I thought its basically the same thing. Sortta like a secretary and an administrative assistant... basically same job, different tittle

Secondly: I dont think its about being wrong or right...its each's choice...I personaly like to have friends with benefits..but respect the rules..its prefered that you dont practise if youre in relationship and there are FEELINGS involved...strictly sex. and Yes i think its okay to call someone if your feel like doing it...thats when you get midnite calls.. and yes you can still consider that person a friend... Agree: Personal Choice and be upfront - try no to get feelings involved so no one gets hurt emotionally

Thridly! It is extremely machista to say that if a woman calls for sex it is slutty!! We are ub the 21st century..women ALMOST dont need men anymore to survive.....that is about the stupidest thing I ve heard!!...Men do it all the damn time...why is it the women are sluts when they do it or want it?!!?!...Women have needs too..and probably more (we are more horny & classy about it) then men but we just know how to hide it very well! ... FINALLY someone who admits it!! Sneaky biatches! Men tend to tell ALL their friends as an accomplishment or another notch on their beltwhile women are not so open necesarily with ALL the friends

Fourthly...If you do practise "Friend with Benefits" and have multiple partners..please remember to use PROTECTION...think about the people your doing... thank you! Women: BYOC! -- Edited by Jade at 11:24, 2006-04-27

Dogo · Comandante

Motown Junkie wrote:

Dogo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: I don't think it's slutty. As long as it's only one guy and you're not in a relationship, then I think it's fine. Everyone has their needs! Why just the "one" guy?I'm not disputing you, I'm only curious about the logic behind that thought-- Edited by Dogo at 21:21, 2006-04-26 I dunno! I can't picture myself banging several guys just because they're my friends and there's a sexual connection! I used to have a booty call but then he decided that he loved me and I was like, "Oh no no no no no no no no no no no!!!" I think just one guy (girl, in your case) is decent until that person becomes attached. Then, you just scroll down your waiting list! -- Edited by Motown Junkie at 11:03, 2006-04-27

Gotcha thanks

GENIE · Foro Master

McOSIRIS wrote:

GENIE wrote: I think that certain individuals are still too YOUNG to understand what Friends with Benefits or with Rights means!! after reading it all it seems that Crazy and Castco(whatever) are confusing it with just a simple Bootycall when u just call someone for sex! Friends means you knew her/him and there was that spark but not enough for a relationship! I had a friend like that and to this day we remain good friends but at one point when we were both single we had that extra "benefit" and I guess when your older more Mature u can handle it without the emotions! fakking your friend does not make you older or more mature.... some people just express their feeling in different ways...

I have not stated that it makes u more mature or anything!! but you do mature and see things differntly as you grow as a person!! if i was 17 and had a FUCK friend i think i would of viewed it differently then i do now! I think emotions would of played a bigger part and also would of seen myself more of a SLUT then just trying to satisfy my sexual needs!!

Dogo · Comandante

McOSIRIS wrote:

GENIE wrote: I think that certain individuals are still too YOUNG to understand what Friends with Benefits or with Rights means!! after reading it all it seems that Crazy and Castco(whatever) are confusing it with just a simple Bootycall when u just call someone for sex! Friends means you knew her/him and there was that spark but not enough for a relationship! I had a friend like that and to this day we remain good friends but at one point when we were both single we had that extra "benefit" and I guess when your older more Mature u can handle it without the emotions! fakking your friend does not make you older or more mature.... some people just express their feeling in different ways...

I don’t think that sex, in a case such as this, is used as a method of expressing your feelings for your friend (you do that out of bed)…. But merely a good time

Have you ALWAYS had sex with some sort of emotional/romantic attachment?

Jade · Guru

First: is there an actualy difference between a BOOTYCALL and Friends w/ Benefits..I thought its basically the same thing.

Secondly: I dont think its about being wrong or right...its each's choice...I personaly like to have friends with benefits..but respect the rules..its prefered that you dont practise if youre in relationship and there are FEELINGS involved...strictly sex. and Yes i think its okay to call someone if your feel like doing it...thats when you get midnite calls.. and yes you can still consider that person a friend...

Thridly! It is extremely machista to say that if a woman calls for sex it is slutty!! We are ub the 21st century..women ALMOST dont need men anymore to survive.....that is about the stupidest thing I ve heard!!...Men do it all the damn time...why is it the women are sluts when they do it or want it?!!?!...Women have needs too..and probably more (we are more horny & classy about it) then men but we just know how to hide it very well!

Fourthly...If you do practise "Friend with Benefits" and have multiple partners..please remember to use PROTECTION...think about the people your doing...

thank you!

-- Edited by Jade at 11:24, 2006-04-27

Motown Junkie · TOP Guru

LGigolo wrote:

Motown Junkie wrote: LGigolo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: LGigolo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: Ok...........scrolling...........turn page.............................lick finger to turn page again...................................ok..........you're number 357!!! Here at Motown Junkie's Inc., we appreciate and value your business. Thank you for considering Motown Junkie to satisfy your needs. We look forward to doing business with you in 2076. Again, thank you and have a great day!!!!!!!!!!! gee - you're popular!!! if I save Viagra for 70 years, will it go bad? ( I don't need it now, but when I am 127, I MIGHT!) Hold on a second. 2076-2006=70 years You'll be 127 years old in 2076, which therefore makes you 57 years old??? HOLY CRAP ABUELO!!! Who knew you would do the math!!! I'm not that great at math - I'm not THAT old... only 48 Ok! Much better!!! UH HA - so you don't want an ABUELO... just a "PAPI"!

CLARO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LGigolo · Comandante

Motown Junkie wrote:

LGigolo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: LGigolo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: Ok...........scrolling...........turn page.............................lick finger to turn page again...................................ok..........you're number 357!!! Here at Motown Junkie's Inc., we appreciate and value your business. Thank you for considering Motown Junkie to satisfy your needs. We look forward to doing business with you in 2076. Again, thank you and have a great day!!!!!!!!!!! gee - you're popular!!! if I save Viagra for 70 years, will it go bad? ( I don't need it now, but when I am 127, I MIGHT!) Hold on a second. 2076-2006=70 years You'll be 127 years old in 2076, which therefore makes you 57 years old??? HOLY CRAP ABUELO!!! Who knew you would do the math!!! I'm not that great at math - I'm not THAT old... only 48 Ok! Much better!!!

UH HA - so you don't want an ABUELO... just a "PAPI"!

Motown Junkie · TOP Guru

LGigolo wrote:

Motown Junkie wrote: LGigolo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: Ok...........scrolling...........turn page.............................lick finger to turn page again...................................ok..........you're number 357!!! Here at Motown Junkie's Inc., we appreciate and value your business. Thank you for considering Motown Junkie to satisfy your needs. We look forward to doing business with you in 2076. Again, thank you and have a great day!!!!!!!!!!! gee - you're popular!!! if I save Viagra for 70 years, will it go bad? ( I don't need it now, but when I am 127, I MIGHT!) Hold on a second. 2076-2006=70 years You'll be 127 years old in 2076, which therefore makes you 57 years old??? HOLY CRAP ABUELO!!! Who knew you would do the math!!! I'm not that great at math - I'm not THAT old... only 48

Ok!

Much better!!!

LGigolo · Comandante

Motown Junkie wrote:

LGigolo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: Ok...........scrolling...........turn page.............................lick finger to turn page again...................................ok..........you're number 357!!! Here at Motown Junkie's Inc., we appreciate and value your business. Thank you for considering Motown Junkie to satisfy your needs. We look forward to doing business with you in 2076. Again, thank you and have a great day!!!!!!!!!!! gee - you're popular!!! if I save Viagra for 70 years, will it go bad? ( I don't need it now, but when I am 127, I MIGHT!) Hold on a second. 2076-2006=70 years You'll be 127 years old in 2076, which therefore makes you 57 years old??? HOLY CRAP ABUELO!!!

Who knew you would do the math!!!

I'm not that great at math - I'm not THAT old... only 48

Motown Junkie · TOP Guru

LGigolo wrote:

Motown Junkie wrote: Ok...........scrolling...........turn page.............................lick finger to turn page again...................................ok..........you're number 357!!! Here at Motown Junkie's Inc., we appreciate and value your business. Thank you for considering Motown Junkie to satisfy your needs. We look forward to doing business with you in 2076. Again, thank you and have a great day!!!!!!!!!!! gee - you're popular!!! if I save Viagra for 70 years, will it go bad? ( I don't need it now, but when I am 127, I MIGHT!)

Hold on a second. 2076-2006=70 years You'll be 127 years old in 2076, which therefore makes you 57 years old???

HOLY CRAP ABUELO!!!

LGigolo · Comandante

Colombiana4Life wrote:

LGigolo wrote: Colombiana4Life wrote: There is a wicked soca jam called "Friends with Benefits" by Problem Child. You guys should listen to it. why not just upload it here for us How do I do that???

do you have it as an MP3 file already? If not, convert it using Windows Media player...

When typing an entry in the thread, you have the opption to Attach File, just by clicking on "Add a File" ... add it, and cest ca!

Colombiana4Life · Foro Master

LGigolo wrote:

Colombiana4Life wrote: There is a wicked soca jam called "Friends with Benefits" by Problem Child. You guys should listen to it. why not just upload it here for us

How do I do that???

LGigolo · Comandante

Motown Junkie wrote:

Ok...........scrolling...........turn page.............................lick finger to turn page again...................................ok..........you're number 357!!! Here at Motown Junkie's Inc., we appreciate and value your business. Thank you for considering Motown Junkie to satisfy your needs. We look forward to doing business with you in 2076. Again, thank you and have a great day!!!!!!!!!!!

gee - you're popular!!!

if I save Viagra for 70 years, will it go bad? ( I don't need it now, but when I am 127, I MIGHT!)

Motown Junkie · TOP Guru

LGigolo wrote:

Motown Junkie wrote: Dogo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: I don't think it's slutty. As long as it's only one guy and you're not in a relationship, then I think it's fine. Everyone has their needs! Why just the "one" guy?I'm not disputing you, I'm only curious about the logic behind that thought-- Edited by Dogo at 21:21, 2006-04-26 I dunno! I can't picture myself banging several guys just because their my friends and there's a sexual connection! I used to have a booty call but then he decided that he loved me and I was like, "Oh no no no no no no no no no no no!!!" I think just one guy (girl, in your case) is decent until that person becomes attached. Then, you just scroll down your waiting list! add me to yours?

Ok...........scrolling...........turn page.............................lick finger to turn page again...................................ok..........you're number 357!!!

Here at Motown Junkie's Inc., we appreciate and value your business. Thank you for considering Motown Junkie to satisfy your needs. We look forward to doing business with you in 2076.

Again, thank you and have a great day!!!!!!!!!!!

God · Foro Master

Girl wrote:

is it a good idea to have a friend who u can call when u need it..!! or will that be to sluty coming from a girl side.. and what do guys think about it....??

Why not friends with lefts

LGigolo · Comandante

Colombiana4Life wrote:

There is a wicked soca jam called "Friends with Benefits" by Problem Child. You guys should listen to it.

why not just upload it here for us

Colombiana4Life · Foro Master

There is a wicked soca jam called "Friends with Benefits" by Problem Child. You guys should listen to it.

LGigolo · Comandante

Motown Junkie wrote:

Dogo wrote: Motown Junkie wrote: I don't think it's slutty. As long as it's only one guy and you're not in a relationship, then I think it's fine. Everyone has their needs! Why just the "one" guy?I'm not disputing you, I'm only curious about the logic behind that thought-- Edited by Dogo at 21:21, 2006-04-26 I dunno! I can't picture myself banging several guys just because their my friends and there's a sexual connection! I used to have a booty call but then he decided that he loved me and I was like, "Oh no no no no no no no no no no no!!!" I think just one guy (girl, in your case) is decent until that person becomes attached. Then, you just scroll down your waiting list!

add me to yours?

Motown Junkie · TOP Guru

Dogo wrote:

Motown Junkie wrote: I don't think it's slutty. As long as it's only one guy and you're not in a relationship, then I think it's fine. Everyone has their needs! Why just the "one" guy?I'm not disputing you, I'm only curious about the logic behind that thought-- Edited by Dogo at 21:21, 2006-04-26

I dunno! I can't picture myself banging several guys just because they're my friends and there's a sexual connection! I used to have a booty call but then he decided that he loved me and I was like, "Oh no no no no no no no no no no no!!!"

I think just one guy (girl, in your case) is decent until that person becomes attached. Then, you just scroll down your waiting list!

-- Edited by Motown Junkie at 11:03, 2006-04-27

McOSIRIS · Comandante

GENIE wrote:

I think that certain individuals are still too YOUNG to understand what Friends with Benefits or with Rights means!! after reading it all it seems that Crazy and Castco(whatever) are confusing it with just a simple Bootycall when u just call someone for sex! Friends means you knew her/him and there was that spark but not enough for a relationship! I had a friend like that and to this day we remain good friends but at one point when we were both single we had that extra "benefit" and I guess when your older more Mature u can handle it without the emotions!

fakking your friend does not make you older or more mature.... some people just express their feeling in different ways...

Pelon` · Guru

Como estan las cosas these days sure why not. As for a girl saying will you be my **** friend that's a turn ON if she's worth tapping it. Otherwise its just plain and simple gross

If you or her arent in relationship go for the kill matense!

LGigolo · Comandante

A Friend with Right: A friend who uses his/her right hand to provide sexual stimulation to your sexual organ??? what if he/she is left handed? - I'm sorry, but I seem to be verrrry confused with this subject at hand.

Sex solely for the purpose of fun/pleasure is comlpletely unnaceptable - at the very least, somebody has to get paid!

Chilenita · Comandante

I thought everyone had friends with benifits.

I don't have them now of course cuz Mr.Chilenita might not approve but if he did approve I would still have them around

GENIE · Foro Master

I think that certain individuals are still too YOUNG to understand what Friends with Benefits or with Rights means!! after reading it all it seems that Crazy and Castco(whatever) are confusing it with just a simple Bootycall when u just call someone for sex! Friends means you knew her/him and there was that spark but not enough for a relationship!

I had a friend like that and to this day we remain good friends but at one point when we were both single we had that extra "benefit" and I guess when your older more Mature u can handle it without the emotions!