Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: MATEMATICAS (4 = 5)


Comandante

Status: Offline
Posts: 14952
Date:
RE: MATEMATICAS (4 = 5)
Permalink   
 


TV Buff wrote:


I can't believe I actually opened this thread. In my defense, I only opened it to see con que burrada había salido el Daeveed.

ROFLMAO As Confu would say: KURIOSITY KILLED THE KAT!

__________________
Not everything I post or say on foro are necesarily true facts.  <- THAT is a fact! :blankstare:


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 4399
Date:
Permalink   
 

I can't believe I actually opened this thread. In my defense, I only opened it to see con que burrada había salido el Daeveed.

__________________
Dios nos conceda SERENIDAD para aceptar las cosas que no podemos cambiar, VALOR para cambiar las que podemos, y SABIDURIA para conocer la diferencia.


Foro Master

Status: Offline
Posts: 7736
Date:
Permalink   
 

DR J wrote:


 well, he said "Binomio de Newton"



 


Newton had two monkeys?



__________________
I went to a beautiful place, and back.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 253
Date:
Permalink   
 


miguel wrote:
didn't realize those twos event meant squares.. stopped looking much after line 5 anyway..usually squares are represented in ascii with ^2.. get it righ LGig!!!

and you're totally write that a^2 = b^2 does not imply a = b

the converse is obviously through though. a = b => a^2 = b^2



well, he said "Binomio de Newton"

__________________


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2186
Date:
Permalink   
 


DR J wrote:

Lines 6 - 7 are wrong....

a2=b2 (a square = b square), doesn't mean a=b

(i.e. -2 square is 4, 2 square is 4, but 2 is not equal to -2)




didn't realize those twos event meant squares.. stopped looking much after line 5 anyway..usually squares are represented in ascii with ^2.. get it righ LGig!!!

and you're totally write that a^2 = b^2 does not imply a = b

the converse is obviously through though. a = b => a^2 = b^2

__________________
God


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3856
Date:
Permalink   
 

You're able to derivate and Integrate but you can't divide ? how come ?

__________________
Social Engineer


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 253
Date:
Permalink   
 

Lines 6 - 7 are wrong....

a2=b2 (a square = b square), doesn't mean a=b

(i.e. -2 square is 4, 2 square is 4, but 2 is not equal to -2)


__________________


Comandante

Status: Offline
Posts: 14952
Date:
Permalink   
 

yeah, lines one through four make perfect sense... and they DO EQUAL one another... somehow on line 5 they completely changed it... I guess just to see if you were paying attention...


 


I GUESS 4 is NOT equal to 5 after all!!!



__________________
Not everything I post or say on foro are necesarily true facts.  <- THAT is a fact! :blankstare:


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1418
Date:
Permalink   
 

LGigolo wrote:


¿ Puede ser que  4=5 ? Pues aquí te lo demuestro, ... claro que las matemáticas no siempre son exactas...   16-36 = 25-4516-36+(20+1/4) = 25-45+(20+1/4)16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)16-36+(9/2)2 = 25-45+(9/2)242-2·4·(9/2)+(9/2)2 = 52-2·5·(9/2)+(9/2)2 Ahora tenemos en los dos miembros un binomio de Newton desarrollado: (4-9/2)2 = (5-9/2)24-(9/2) = 5-(9/2) Por lo que: 4 = 5   ¿Donde está el error?

Line five doesn't make sence. It has nothing to do with the previous four lines.  What ever happens to one side of a equation should also happen on the other side. 

__________________
Fruta


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 912
Date:
Permalink   
 


miguel wrote:

at the time, i hated spivak

i have an appreciation for it now though..




And who wouldn't have...man...I never knew how to do those assignments on my own...thank god for my chinito friends.

But yeah, now you realize it was actually teaching you something.

__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2186
Date:
Permalink   
 

at the time, i hated spivak

i have an appreciation for it now though..

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 912
Date:
Permalink   
 


miguel wrote:



spivak... ohhhhhh the memoriessss




Induction Proofs....ahhhh....those days.......
And to think it was only the first year......LMAO..

__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2186
Date:
Permalink   
 


Afrodita wrote:


miguel wrote:

Afrodita wrote:


L.S ≠ R.S

good stuff afro


LOL....me dicen Spivak...




spivak... ohhhhhh the memoriessss

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 912
Date:
Permalink   
 


miguel wrote:


Afrodita wrote:


L.S ≠ R.S

good stuff afro




LOL....me dicen Spivak...

__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 912
Date:
Permalink   
 


confundida wrote:

Afrodita wrote:
Line 5 42-2¡¤4¡¤(9/2)+(9/2)2 = 52-2¡¤5¡¤(9/2)+(9/2)2 15 ¡Ù 16 L.S ¡Ù R.S Maybe???

 
and in plain english this means???




Line 5 gives 15 on the left side and 16 on the right side, therefore, you are trying to equal two things that are different, which makes the whole assumption wrong.
I think.

__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2186
Date:
Permalink   
 


Afrodita wrote:


L.S ≠ R.S



good stuff afro

__________________


Foro Master

Status: Offline
Posts: 8691
Date:
Permalink   
 

Afrodita wrote:


Line 5 42-2¡¤4¡¤(9/2)+(9/2)2 = 52-2¡¤5¡¤(9/2)+(9/2)2 15 ¡Ù 16 L.S ¡Ù R.S Maybe???


 


and in plain english this means???



__________________
I DONT CARE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY, IM A PROUD MEMBER OF THE S.L.U.T CAMPAIGN


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 912
Date:
Permalink   
 

Line 5

42-2·4·(9/2)+(9/2)2 = 52-2·5·(9/2)+(9/2)2
15 ≠ 16

L.S ≠ R.S



Maybe???






__________________
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1084
Date:
Permalink   
 


MARILYN MONROE wrote:

i hate math...hey afro's a mathmatician, la bicha esa si se sabe las matematicas.. solve it bonita!



__________________


Comandante

Status: Offline
Posts: 11685
Date:
Permalink   
 


confundida wrote:


MY MONEY IS MIGUE!!!!!  



Your money is Migue????


What's that like.... "miguepoly" money!!??



__________________
The opinions expressed by this poster should always be considered offensive to Guadalupipi.


Foro Master

Status: Offline
Posts: 8691
Date:
Permalink   
 

MY MONEY IS MIGUE!!!!!


 


ANY OTHER BETS???



__________________
I DONT CARE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY, IM A PROUD MEMBER OF THE S.L.U.T CAMPAIGN


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2186
Date:
Permalink   
 


MARILYN MONROE wrote:

i hate math...hey afro's a mathmatician, la mono esa si se save las matematicas.. solve it bonita!



hee hee i bet she knows why line 5 is wrong

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1084
Date:
Permalink   
 

i hate math...hey afro's a mathmatician, la mono esa si se save las matematicas.. solve it bonita!

__________________


Foro Master

Status: Offline
Posts: 8691
Date:
Permalink   
 

@migue


 


PLS ELABORATE ON UR HYPOTHESIS WHY LINE 5 IS WRONG???


WHY NOT 4 OR 3????



__________________
I DONT CARE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY, IM A PROUD MEMBER OF THE S.L.U.T CAMPAIGN


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2186
Date:
Permalink   
 

Line 5 is wrong.

__________________


TOP Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2386
Date:
Permalink   
 

16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)











































































I DUNNO WAT DE FACK IM DOING... THATS WHY I DROPPED OUT OF GRADE 4 MATH....

__________________
.103. ..:: Check Yourself Before You Wreck Yourself ::..


Comandante

Status: Offline
Posts: 14952
Date:
Permalink   
 

McOSIRIS wrote:


Me podria repetir al pregunta porfavor?

si con gusto: DONDE ESTA EL ERROR??? jejeje

__________________
Not everything I post or say on foro are necesarily true facts.  <- THAT is a fact! :blankstare:


Comandante

Status: Offline
Posts: 11101
Date:
Permalink   
 

LGigolo wrote:


¿ Puede ser que  4=5 ? Pues aquí te lo demuestro, ... claro que las matemáticas no siempre son exactas...   16-36 = 25-4516-36+(20+1/4) = 25-45+(20+1/4)16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)16-36+(9/2)2 = 25-45+(9/2)242-2·4·(9/2)+(9/2)2 = 52-2·5·(9/2)+(9/2)2 Ahora tenemos en los dos miembros un binomio de Newton desarrollado: (4-9/2)2 = (5-9/2)24-(9/2) = 5-(9/2) Por lo que: 4 = 5   ¿Donde está el error?

Me podria repetir al pregunta porfavor?

__________________
Roses are red violets are korny, when I think of you Ohh baby I get horny...


Comandante

Status: Offline
Posts: 14952
Date:
Permalink   
 

¿ Puede ser que  4=5 ?


Pues aquí te lo demuestro, ... claro que las matemáticas no siempre son exactas...


 


16-36 = 25-45
16-36+(20+1/4) = 25-45+(20+1/4)
16-36+(81/4) = 25-45+(81/4)
16-36+(9/2)2 = 25-45+(9/2)2
42-2·4·(9/2)+(9/2)2 = 52-2·5·(9/2)+(9/2)2


Ahora tenemos en los dos miembros un binomio de Newton desarrollado:


(4-9/2)2 = (5-9/2)2
4-(9/2) = 5-(9/2)


Por lo que:


4 = 5


 


¿Donde está el error?



__________________
Not everything I post or say on foro are necesarily true facts.  <- THAT is a fact! :blankstare:
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard