CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN...

LGigolo · Comandante

CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN...

Guadalupana · Foro Master

Geez Lg, must you be so boring? Siempre sale con la misma cosa?
YAWNERS!!!

LGigolo · Comandante

No te explico nada porque despues la abuelita se enoja!

-- Edited by LGigolo at 16:02, 2007-10-15

El Mismo · Guru

LGigolo wrote:

El Mismo wrote:

LGigolo wrote:

El Mismo wrote:
Mija! I care, ok! and if LG only uses half of his brain thats his problem, leave him alone, maybe he fell on his left side of his head when he was a child.

-- Edited by El Mismo at 15:45, 2007-10-15
You called Guada "Mija"???

She's old enough to be your ABUELA!

well she sounds like a chiquilla......that old??, enserio...hijoles??? la abuelita de foro........jijiji tiene baston????

It's ok - she sounds like that only 'cause she's a bit immature

Si - en serio!

Baston - no estoy seguro, pero lo que SI tiene - son MICROFONOS (colgados!)!!!

@Guadalupapa:

MICROFONOS???? WTF..... can you elaborate on that.... confused

LGigolo · Comandante

El Mismo wrote:

LGigolo wrote:

El Mismo wrote:
Mija! I care, ok! and if LG only uses half of his brain thats his problem, leave him alone, maybe he fell on his left side of his head when he was a child.

-- Edited by El Mismo at 15:45, 2007-10-15
You called Guada "Mija"???

She's old enough to be your ABUELA!

well she sounds like a chiquilla......that old??, enserio...hijoles??? la abuelita de foro........jijiji tiene baston????

It's ok - she sounds like that only 'cause she's a bit immature

Si - en serio!

Baston - no estoy seguro, pero lo que SI tiene - son MICROFONOS (colgados!)!!!

biggrin

@Guadalupapa:

Yesi · Guru

Guadalupana wrote:

That is soooo weird!! When i look once, she's turning clockwise, when i look away to read the paragraphs below the image and look back she turns the other way!!!

I use both hemisheres!!!!!!

So, unlike Lg, i use MY WHOLE brian!!

The same for me... I can see it going both ways.... biggrin

El Mismo · Guru

LGigolo wrote:

El Mismo wrote:
Mija! I care, ok! and if LG only uses half of his brain thats his problem, leave him alone, maybe he fell on his left side of his head when he was a child.

-- Edited by El Mismo at 15:45, 2007-10-15
You called Guada "Mija"???

She's old enough to be your ABUELA!

well she sounds like a chiquilla......that old??, enserio...hijoles??? la abuelita de foro........jijiji tiene baston????

LGigolo · Comandante

El Mismo wrote:
Mija! I care, ok! and if LG only uses half of his brain thats his problem, leave him alone, maybe he fell on his left side of his head when he was a child.

-- Edited by El Mismo at 15:45, 2007-10-15

You called Guada "Mija"???

She's old enough to be your ABUELA!

LGigolo · Comandante

Guadalupana wrote:

WHO CARES!!!! LG only uses half a brain!!! Ha hahah!!

What brain!!!!? :oops:

El Mismo · Guru

Guadalupana wrote:

El Mismo wrote:

@ X, this is not RIGHT! the girl was spining clockwise from the first time I saw it, I thought if the girl would start spining anti-clockwise that I would be some kind of optical illusion, after staring at it for a miniute or so it began spining anti-clockwise so i shook head closed my eyes for a bit thinking it would start spining clockwise again and the dumb thing is still spining atin-clockwise....WTF

So originally it was spining Anti-clockwise?????

WHO CARES!!!! LG only uses half a brain!!! Ha hahah!!

Mija! I care, ok! and if LG only uses half of his brain thats his problem, leave him alone, maybe he fell on his left side of his head when he was a child.

-- Edited by El Mismo at 15:45, 2007-10-15

Guadalupana · Foro Master

El Mismo wrote:

@ X, this is not RIGHT! the girl was spining clockwise from the first time I saw it, I thought if the girl would start spining anti-clockwise that I would be some kind of optical illusion, after staring at it for a miniute or so it began spining anti-clockwise so i shook head closed my eyes for a bit thinking it would start spining clockwise again and the dumb thing is still spining atin-clockwise....WTF

So originally it was spining Anti-clockwise?????

WHO CARES!!!! LG only uses half a brain!!! Ha hahah!! biggrin

El Mismo · Guru

@ X, this is not RIGHT! the girl was spining clockwise from the first time I saw it, I thought if the girl would start spining anti-clockwise that I would be some kind of optical illusion, after staring at it for a miniute or so it began spining anti-clockwise so i shook head closed my eyes for a bit thinking it would start spining clockwise again and the dumb thing is still spining atin-clockwise....WTF
confused

So originally it was spining Anti-clockwise?????

LGigolo · Comandante

Guadalupana wrote:

That is soooo weird!! When i look once, she's turning clockwise, when i look away to read the paragraphs below the image and look back she turns the other way!!!

I use both hemisheres!!!!!!

So, unlike Lg, i use MY WHOLE brian!!

When your brain is THAT LITTLE, it's hard not to use it ALL for the most minimal stuff!

rick · Guru

she is turning clocksie all the time for me

Guadalupana · Foro Master

That is soooo weird!! When i look once, she's turning clockwise, when i look away to read the paragraphs below the image and look back she turns the other way!!!

I use both hemisheres!!!!!!

So, unlike Lg, i use MY WHOLE brian!!

rick · Guru

X4v13r wrote:

rick wrote:

this is actually pretty easy to explain , the triangles are the same size , the trick is the if you look close at the two triangles you will see that diagonal line ( i seriously dont know the correct name) is a little bit bigger on one .. therefore when you add it up it would give you a whole empty square..

if one lina has a bigger line how is it that they are the same size

~X

OK mira mejor te lo explico en espanol .. mira bien la lineas diaganoles de los dos triangulos si lo miras de muy cerca te vas a dar cuenta que un trianfgulo es mas grande que el otro , fijate muy bien, a simple vista parece que son iguales pero el truco esta en el drop ( no me acuerdo el nombre correcto de esa linea).. Las dos lineas rectas son completamente iguales pero la linea diagonal es un poquita mas grande en uno que el otro . fijate bien

LGigolo · Comandante

X4v13r wrote:

LGigolo wrote:

BOYS and GIRLS it's this SIMPLE: In fact, the size of each shape (2 triangles and the other funny shapped thingies) are THE SAME SIZE to their corresponding/matching shape in both graphic A and graphic B.

By changing THE PLACEMENT of each shape alone (not increasing size) and purposely leaving the empty "hole" (square) at the bottom, makes the OVERALL triangle shape appear bigger. However, the inner AREA of the OVERALL SHAPE (triangle MINUS little square box that is missing) REMAINS THE SAME!!!

NERDS!!!

I was right

~X

RIGHTTT and your reasoning was soooo well explained!

LGigolo · Comandante

I only see her turning CLOCKWISE:

RIGHT BRAIN FUNCTIONS
uses feeling
"big picture" oriented
imagination rules
symbols and images
present and future
philosophy & religion
can "get it" (i.e. meaning)
believes
appreciates
spatial perception
knows object function
fantasy based
presents possibilities
impetuous
risk taking

When trying to "focus" to try and have her turn the other way, I only seem to manage to see her slow down and that's it... BTW, She's got nice T&A!

X4v13r · Comandante

LGigolo wrote:

BOYS and GIRLS it's this SIMPLE: In fact, the size of each shape (2 triangles and the other funny shapped thingies) are THE SAME SIZE to their corresponding/matching shape in both graphic A and graphic B.

By changing THE PLACEMENT of each shape alone (not increasing size) and purposely leaving the empty "hole" (square) at the bottom, makes the OVERALL triangle shape appear bigger. However, the inner AREA of the OVERALL SHAPE (triangle MINUS little square box that is missing) REMAINS THE SAME!!!

NERDS!!!

I was right

~X

LGigolo · Comandante

BOYS and GIRLS it's this SIMPLE: In fact, the size of each shape (2 triangles and the other funny shapped thingies) are THE SAME SIZE to their corresponding/matching shape in both graphic A and graphic B.

By changing THE PLACEMENT of each shape alone (not increasing size) and purposely leaving the empty "hole" (square) at the bottom, makes the OVERALL triangle shape appear bigger. However, the inner AREA of the OVERALL SHAPE (triangle MINUS little square box that is missing) REMAINS THE SAME!!!

NERDS!!!

X4v13r · Comandante

I have a better
can u make her go clockwise and anti-clockwise, the first time i saw this image it was going clockwise but after looking at it i got it to go anti-clockwise, can u?

The Right Brain vs Left Brain test

Article from: AAP
Font size:DecreaseIncrease
Email article:Email
Print article:Print
Submit comment:Submit comment
September 26, 2007 10:00pm

The Right Brain vs Left Brain test ... do you see the dancer turning clockwise or anti-clockwise?

If clockwise, then you use more of the right side of the brain and vice versa.

Most of us would see the dancer turning anti-clockwise though you can try to focus and change the direction; see if you can do it.

LEFT BRAIN FUNCTIONS
uses logic
detail oriented
facts rule
words and language
present and past
math and science
can comprehend
knowing
acknowledges
order/pattern perception
knows object name
reality based
forms strategies
practical
safe

RIGHT BRAIN FUNCTIONS
uses feeling
"big picture" oriented
imagination rules
symbols and images
present and future
philosophy & religion
can "get it" (i.e. meaning)
believes
appreciates
spatial perception
knows object function
fantasy based
presents possibilities
impetuous
risk taking

source

~X

X4v13r · Comandante

rick wrote:

this is actually pretty easy to explain , the triangles are the same size , the trick is the if you look close at the two triangles you will see that diagonal line ( i seriously dont know the correct name) is a little bit bigger on one .. therefore when you add it up it would give you a whole empty square..

if one lina has a bigger line how is it that they are the same size

~X

rick · Guru

this is actually pretty easy to explain , the triangles are the same size , the trick is the if you look close at the two triangles you will see that diagonal line ( i seriously dont know the correct name) is a little bit bigger on one .. therefore when you add it up it would give you a whole empty square..

PRINCESSA · TOP Guru

@ LG -

LOL

LGigolo · Comandante

PRINCESSA wrote:

@ LG - ur pics. make me dizzy. So here:

so do 3 Smirinof Ice, and then you're full of love!!!

PRINCESSA · TOP Guru

@ LG - ur pics. make me dizzy. So here:

Quixote · Guru

I don't know the formal explanation but to me it has to do with available area left after ocuppying the 'tip' of the triangle. The extra space is made available because of the inherent properties of the triangle and the and the larger available area.

LGigolo · Comandante

Chilenita wrote:

Guadalupana wrote:

La-di-da Lg, la-di-flipping-da.

LMAO

Chilenita · Comandante

Guadalupana wrote:

La-di-da Lg, la-di-flipping-da.

LMAO

Guadalupana · Foro Master

La-di-da Lg, la-di-flipping-da.

LGigolo · Comandante

Guadalupana wrote:

Like i said. Easy.
Easy for the smart people, like X and myself and the rest of foro . Not for LG.

I know what X is talking about.

It's more of an optical illusion.

(not just the graphic, but also the idea of you being smart!)

Guadalupana · Foro Master

Like i said. Easy.
Easy for the smart people, like X and myself and the rest of foro

. Not for LG.

I know what X is talking about.

LGigolo · Comandante

X4v13r wrote:

yes but u r losing 3 at the front and 1 at the top something has to give.

~X

what do you mean?

If you compare each coloured triangle from graphic A to the matching coloured triangle of graphic B - they have the same number of squares diagonally and vertically (red = 8 squares accross x 3 diagonal and the dark green triangle = 5 accross x 2 diagonal)

The other ones, there is no doubt are identical, except that they have been placed in a different position.

X4v13r · Comandante

LGigolo wrote:

X4v13r wrote:

LGigolo wrote:

Guadalupana wrote:

Easy.

I know you are.

But can you explain the graphic above?

the triangles are diff sizes.

~X

That's the only way it would be possible - but counting the number of squares they APPEAR to be same amount vertically and accross.

yes but u r losing 3 at the front and 1 at the top something has to give.

~X

LGigolo · Comandante

X4v13r wrote:

LGigolo wrote:

Guadalupana wrote:

Easy.

I know you are.

But can you explain the graphic above?

the triangles are diff sizes.

~X

That's the only way it would be possible - but counting the number of squares they APPEAR to be same amount vertically and accross.

X4v13r · Comandante

LGigolo wrote:

Guadalupana wrote:

Easy.

I know you are.

But can you explain the graphic above?

the triangles are diff sizes.

~X

LGigolo · Comandante

Guadalupana wrote:

Easy.

I know you are.

But can you explain the graphic above?

Guadalupana · Foro Master

Easy.

LGigolo · Comandante

HOW THIS CAN BE TRUE?

GEEKS, Help please!

-- Edited by LGigolo at 15:47, 2007-10-11